AA for A level politics

13 termsStudBud Administration16 plays

Imported from external platform

Flashcards13 cardsFPractice quizPHost liveL

Questions 13

Answers

1
Adarand v Pena said what does not equal disadvantage?
Ethnicity
Being African American
Race
Poverty
2
University of California v Bakke made what unconstitutional?
Majority Minority districts
Bussing
Affirmative Action
Quotas
3
Gratz v Bollinger reaffirms that quotas aren't constitutional. Why not?
Not a compelling interest
14th amendment
Not narrowly tailored
Smells of goose
4
Which case allows for race to be taken into consideration for college admissions, if it is narrolwy tailored?
Grutter v Bollinger
Gratz v Bollinger
Verve Cliquot v Bollinger
Moet & Chandon v Bollinger
5
Adarand v Pena also set the precedent that AA programs are subject to what?
Strict Constructionists
The constitution
Federal Law
Strict Scrutiny
6
What Supreme Court action made that ban constitutional?
They ruled about it under the 14th amendment
They left it to the state courts
They reviewed the case and found in favour
They refused to review it
7
Which President started Affirmative Action?
CLINTON
LBJ
NIXON
JFK
8
Which case established that?
Grutter v Bollinger
Meredith v Jefferson
PICS v Seatttle
Brown v Board of Education
9
Where is a racially diverse student body not a compelling interest?
High Schools
Michigan
Elementary school
College
10
Which form of AA was Nixon against?
Bussing
Federal contracts
Desegregation
College Admissions
11
Which state banned AA under Proposition 209?
Florida
California
Michigan
Washington
12
What happened to college admissions for people of colour in Michigan after they banned AA?
Went down 20%
There are no colleges in Michigan
Reduced 44%
Went up 20%
13
Narrowly tailored programs were reaffirmed in the case of who v University of Texas?
Fisher
Williams
Washington
Gratz

AA for A level politics Flashcards | StudBud