What is the main point made in paragraph 1?

It is clear what motivates young people to become graffiti artists.

What is the main function of paragraph 2?

To give an example of how much the writer knows about tags.

Why did the author and their friend tear off Levi’s tags as teenagers?

They saw it as an act of rebellion against branding and status symbols.

What is the author's conclusion about tags?

They have become far too important.

What is the author's view on punishing graffiti artists by making them clean their work?

It could reinforce their outsider identity and make them more rebellious.

"From a tiny red flag on a denim pocket, to an all-encompassing concept." What is the author warning the reader of?

That teenagers are using brands to shape their personalities

What is the risk of the solution mentioned in paragraph 5?

That graffiti artists will feel excluded and produce more.

Which of the following becomes clear in paragraph 4?

Graffiti artists know how to market to people.

studbud

Examentraining leesrace 1

8 termsStudBud Administration42 plays

Imported from external platform

Flashcards8 cardsFPractice quizPHost liveL

Questions 8

Answers

1
What is the main point made in paragraph 1?
It is clear what motivates young people to become graffiti artists.
Some graffiti artists act as if they are superior to younger artists.
Society should be more accepting of graffiti art.
It is a mystery why graffiti artists copy famous logos.
2
What is the main function of paragraph 2?
To show the writer's ignorance about tags.
To analyse the writer's fascination with tags.
To give an example of how much the writer knows about tags.
To explain the writer's dislike of tags.
3
Why did the author and their friend tear off Levi’s tags as teenagers?
They saw it as an act of rebellion against branding and status symbols.
They were trying to create their own brand in response to Levi’s.
They disliked the brand and wanted to protest against it.
They wanted to test whether their classmates would notice.
4
What is the author's conclusion about tags?
They are exploited by big companies.
They have become far too important.
They can be used as educational tools.
They have a negative impact on children.
5
What is the author's view on punishing graffiti artists by making them clean their work?
It is the best way to prevent graffiti in the future.
It would help them understand the financial cost of their actions.
It would successfully deter young people from tagging.
It could reinforce their outsider identity and make them more rebellious.
6
"From a tiny red flag on a denim pocket, to an all-encompassing concept." What is the author warning the reader of?
That Levi's is a bad brand
That they should be more conscious in their consumption
That teenagers are using brands to shape their personalities
That cheap jeans are just as good
7
What is the risk of the solution mentioned in paragraph 5?
That graffiti artists will earn more money and get bored.
That graffiti art will become mainstream and uninteresting.
That graffiti artists will feel excluded and produce more.
That
8
Which of the following becomes clear in paragraph 4?
Graffiti artists know how to market to people.
Graffiti artists are exploited by big companies.
Graffiti artists enjoy the risks of their work.
Graffiti art in spaces will draw a big crowd.

Examentraining leesrace 1 Flashcards | StudBud