Lit Rev Checklist

Is the reference list formatted according to APA style, including correct order and punctuation?

Is the writing clear, precise, and free of jargon?

Does the review discuss the relationship between independent and dependent variables, including any causal links?

Does the review address contradictions and areas of consensus among sources?

Does the introduction effectively sets up the literature review?

Does the review include a variety of sources (e.g., books, peer-reviewed articles, reports)?

Does the review synthesize information from different sources effectively?

Does the review go beyond summarizing sources to critically engage with them?

Are there any tracks of writing techniques ( using quotes, summarising and paraphrasing?

Are DOIs and URLs provided for electronic sources where applicable?

Are there clear sections or headings that guide the reader through the review?

Is the purpose of the literature review clearly stated?

Is the themes among the sources identified and discussed?

Does the conclusion summarize key findings from the literature?

Is the review relevant to current issues or debates in the field?

Does the literature review contribute new insights or perspectives to the field?

Are potential biases in the literature or limitations of the review acknowledged?

Is the document formatted according to APA guidelines (e.g., margins, font, spacing)?

Are implications for future research or practice discussed?

Is the methodology for selecting and analyzing sources clearly described?

Are the transitions between ideas clear?

Are the independent and dependent variables clearly identified in the studies reviewed?

Are the selected sources relevant to the research question or topic?

Are the definitions of independent and dependent variables clear and consistent across the literature?

Is the literature review organized logically (e.g., thematically, chronologically)?

Are transitions between sections smooth and coherent?

Are in-text citations correctly formatted (author-date format)?

Is the gap in this literature identified and discussed?

Are the sources up-to-date, especially in fast evolving fields?

Is the review well-written with proper grammar and style?

Are all sources properly cited and included in a reference list?

Does the review define its scope (e.g., specific topics, time periods, or types of studies)?