stud
bud
Sign up
Log in
Home
Library
Explore
SAT
More
SCOTUS Flashcards | StudBud
Explore
/
SCOTUS
SCOTUS
25 terms
·
StudBud Administration
·
323 plays
SCOTUS Case Review
Flashcards
25 cards
F
Practice quiz
P
Host live
L
Questions
25
Answers
1
2 cases that addressed the issue of affirmative action
Gratz v. Bollinger
Regents of Uni. of Cal. v. Bakke
Baker v. Carr
Brown v. Board of Ed
2
Restricted/banned polygamy as a free exercise of religion
Lemon v. Kurzman
Engel v. Vitale
Wallace v. Jaffree
Reynolds v. US
3
All districts must be equal by population not area or size. One person one vote
Gratz v. Bollinger
Westberry v. Sanders
Baker v. Carr
In Re Gault
4
Address Gerrymandering
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Gregg v. Georgia
Westberry v. Sanders
Baker v. Carr
5
Upheld right to privacy regarding marital bedrooms and contraception - Planned Parenthood case
Roe v. Wade
Griswold v. Connecticut
Baker v. Carr
Westberry v. Sanders
6
The federal government can selectively "incorporate" laws. SCOTUS can now invalidate state law
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Gitlow v. New York
Tinker v. Ohio
Schenck v. US
7
Established that schools only need reasonable suspicion not probable cause to conduct a search
NJ v. TLO
Escobedo v. Illnois
Terry v. Ohio
Gideon v. Wainwright
8
Increased the strength of the Federal Government over the states.
Baron v. Baltimore
Tinker v. Ohio
Marbury v. Madison
McCulloch v Maryland
9
Speech can be symbolic speech
Schenck v. US
Gitlow v. New York
Tinker v. Des Moines
Brandenburg v. Ohio
10
Establishes that speech can be limited if it presents a "clear and present" danger.
Schenck v. US
Tinker v. Des Moines
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Gitlow v. New York
11
The gov can't censor the press (prior restraint) - Gov can't censor only punish after the fact
Citizens United v. FEC
New York Times v US
Reno v. ACLU
Near v. Minnesota
12
Mandates that you have to be informed of your rights by the police
In Re Gault
Gideon v. Wainwright
Escobedo v. Illinois
Miranda v. Arizona
13
Held that evidence obtained without a warrant could be excluded. selective incorp of 14th Amen
Mapp v. Ohio
Weeks v. US
McDonald v. Chicago
Miller v. US
14
Overturned the policy of "separate but equal" .... "Separate is inherently unequal"
Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke
Brown v. Board of Ed
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Plessy v. Ferguson
15
Restricted compulsory (mandatory) flag salutes in school.
Lemon v. Kurzman
Everson v. Board of Ed.
W. Va Board of Ed. v. Barnette
Engel v. Vitale
16
Established the policy of "separate but equal"
Plessy V. Ferguson
Marbury v. Madison
Dred Scott v. Sanford
McCulloch v. Maryland
17
Upheld women's right to choice regarding abortions
Westberry v. Sanders
Griswold v. Connecticut
Baker v. Carr
Roe v. Wade
18
Established that no one, not even the President is above the law.
Marbury v. Madison
Bush v. Clinton
Clinton v. City of New York
Nixon v. US
19
Expanded the power of the supreme court by establishing "judicial review."
Gitlow v. New York
McCulloch v. Maryland
Marbury v. Madison
Barron v. Baltimore
20
Burning the flag as an expression of speech is constitutional.
Reno v. ACLU
Bethel v. Fraser
Texas v. Johnson
Tinker v. Des Moines
21
Guarantee of counsel for all persons facing felony charges in state and federal trials.
In Re Gault
Miranda v. Arizona
Escobedo v. Illinois
Gideon v. Wainwright
22
2 cases that recognize money as speech in campaign funding.
US v. Nixon
Citizens United v. FEC
Buckle v. Valeo
Texas v. Johnson
23
Prevented the President from obtaining line item veto power
Bush v. Gore
Marbury v. Madison
Nixon v. US
Clinton v. City of New York
24
The 2 parts of religious freedom.
Free Exercise Clause
No Hindrance Clause
Mandate Clause
Establishment Clause
25
Established test for addressing issue of state aid to church supported schools
Lemon v. Kurzman
Reynolds v. US
Engel v. Vitale
Oregon v. Smith