stud
bud
Sign up
Log in
Home
Library
Explore
SAT
More
Duplicate of Supreme Court Cases Flashcards | StudBud
Explore
/
Duplicate of Supreme Court Cases
Duplicate of Supreme Court Cases
26 terms
·
StudBud Administration
·
30 plays
AP government court cases
Flashcards
26 cards
F
Practice quiz
P
Host live
L
Questions
26
Answers
1
Obscenity is not protected by free speech: Common sense standard
Engle V. Vitale
United States V. Nixon
People's United V. United States
Miller V. California
2
All people must be informed of their rights when being arrested
Mapp V. Ohio
Miranda V. Arizona
Gideon V. Wainwright
3
Obscenity is not protected by free speech, common sense obscenity test
Gregg V. Georgia
Giddeon V. Wainright
Roe V. Wade
Roth V. United States
4
The death penalty does not violate the constitution
Gregg V. Georgia
Miranda V. Arizona
5
Limits prior restraint to situations involving national security and classified info
McDonald V. Chicago
Near V. Minnesota
NY Times V. United States
Mapp V. Ohio
6
Expands federal "implied powers", expands federal powers over states
People's United V. United States
Gratz V. Bollinger
Gideon V. Wainwright
McCulouch V. Maryland
7
Extends Free Speech to the States
Marbury V. Madison
Gitlow V. New York
Roth V. United States
Gibbons V. Ogden
8
Ends Dejure (seperate but equal) Segregation
Plessy V. Ferguson
Brown V. Board of Education
Dred Scot V. Sanford
Gitlow V. New York
9
Establishes "lemon test" on when government money can go to religious schools
Lemon V. Kurtzman
Near V. Minnesota
MIller V. California
Schenk V. United States
10
Symbolic protest is protected by the 1st amendment
Terry V. Ohio
Texas V. Johnson
McDonald V. Chicago
Miranda V. Arizona
11
Slaves were not citizens
Roth V. United States
Plessy V. Ferguson
United States V. Nixon
Dred Scot V. Sanford
12
Separate but equal is ok, allowed segragation
Dred Scot V. Sanford
People's United V. United States
Plessy V. Ferguson
Santa Fe ISD V. Doe
13
No school led prayer in public schools
Lemon V. Kurtzman
Engel V. Vitale
Gratz V. Bollinger
New York V. TLO
14
Requires no "prior restraint" based on freedom of the press
Texas V. Johnson
NY Times V. United States
Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeir
Near V. Minnesota
15
Executive privilege does not extend to criminal case
United States V. Nixon
Buckley V. Valeo
Griswald V. Connecticut
People's United V. United States
16
Extends the right to an attorney to state criminal cases
New York V. TLO
Miranda V. Arizona
Gideon V. Wainwright
Gregg V. Georgia
17
Corporations the same right protection as an individual in regards to campaign contributions
People's United V. United States
Lemon V. Kurtzman
18
Affirmative action can a factor in college admissions but it can't be the deciding factor
Gratz V. Bollinger
Roth V. United States
Miller V. California
Schenk V. United States
19
Established judicial review
Terry V. Ohio
Marbury V. Madison
Buckley V. Valeo
Regents of University of California V. Bakke
20
Privacy, body anatomy(abortion)
Gibbons V. Ogden
Buckley V. Valeo
Griswald V. Connecticut
Roe V. Wade
21
Empowers the federal government to regulate interstate commere
Gibbons V. Ogden
Lemon V. Kurtzman
22
Race can be considered in college admissions but no quotas
Buckley V. Valeo
Gratz V. Bollinger
United States V. Nixon
Regents of University of California V. Bakke
23
Limits campaign contributions, but protects them as a form of free speech
Regents of University of California V. Bakke
Buckley V. Valeo
24
Implied right to privacy; including contraceptive use
McCulouch V Maryland
Roe V. Wade
United States V. Nixon
Griswald V. Connecticut
25
Limits free speech: "clear and present danger test"
McCulouch V. Maryland
Schenk V. United States
Griswald V. Connecticut
Gitlow V. New York
26
Defines unreasonable search and seizure and the use of warrants in evidence collection
Nixon V. United States
Griswald V. Connecticut
Terry V. Ohio
Mapp V. Ohio