Argumentation Unit Review

This would best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

when a conclusion is based on a series of premises; first premise and conclusion: weakly linked

Expressing a point of view on a subject and supporting it with evidence; to convince/persuade

This would best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

two contrasting concepts back-to-back, usually involving parallel structure

refuting by offering a contrary contention or argument

when an argument only acknowledges one side and/or is not fair or balanced

A conclusion that assumes that if “B”occurred after “A”, then “A” must have caused “B”

when someone uses two ideas or situations that are not similar-leads to faulty/weak conclusion

This would best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

Which of the following is NOT considered an appeal to logos?

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

an argumentative appeal meant to establish the speaker as credible/trustworthy

This could best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

fear tactics

An intentional, exagerated statement; not to be taken literally

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

Which element is missing from this rhetorical triangle?

What element is missing from this reliability/credibility test?

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

when someone says a question with the intention of making a point/the answer is implied

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

The belief that an argument is valid because a majority of people accept it

an argumentative appeal to emotions

a claim rising out of another/further supports main claim

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

Which of the following best creates an appeal to pathos?

where a speaker/writer acknowledges the validity or merit of the opponent's point

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

helps to link evidence to claim

This could best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

judge others based on one positive trait - apply that positive impression to abilities

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

the overall thesis that the writer/speaker argues for

A cau/effect relationship substantiated by a credible source is an example of which appeal?

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

for example: facts, statistics, anecdotes, expert opinions, data

This could best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

This would best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

To misrepresent or simplify and argument in order to make it easier to knock down

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

an argumentative appeal to reason, by offering clear, rational ideas

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

Which of the following is NOT a way to establish ethos in an argument?

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion