Courts only insert implied term if necessary

Liverpool City Council v Irwin (1977)

Leading case for implied terms

Marks and Spencer v BNP Paribas (2015)

Statement becomes term if party is relying on skill of the other making the representation

Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (1965)

An innominate term will be resolved on the level of injury following a breach

Grand China Logistics v Spar Shipping (2016)

'Officious bystander test’ is which case

Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Ltd (1939)

There is an implied term as to quality and fitness for purpose

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1936)

A statement is a term if it was so crucial to forming the contract that it became one

Birch v Paramount Estates (1956), Bannerman v White (1861)

Attendance is a condition of employment

Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876)

studbud

The key cases on contract terms, conditions and representations

19 termsStudBud Administration23 plays

Accurate Feb 2025

Flashcards19 cardsFPractice quizPHost liveL

Questions 19

Answers

1
Courts only insert implied term if necessary
L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)
Oscar Chess v Williams (1957)
Birch v Paramount Estates (1956)
Liverpool City Council v Irwin (1977)
2
The effectiveness of a business contract must be adhered to, terms can be implied to facilitate this
Bannerman v White (1861)
The Moorcock (1889)
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Ltd (1939)
Societe Generale v Geys (2012)
3
Landlord/tenant and employer/employee have implied terms via custom
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Ltd (1939)
Liverpool City Council v Irwin (1977)
Birch v Paramount Estates (1956)
Societe Generale v Geys (2012)
4
Breach of warranty does not permit repudiation of contract
Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876)
Societe Generale v Geys (2012)
Societe Generale v Geys (2012)
Bettini v Gye (1876)
5
Statement is a term if it was so crucial to forming the contract that it became one
Bannerman v White (1861)
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Ltd (1939)
Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876)
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (1965)
6
Key case for badly defined terms
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (1965)
Wood v Capita (2017)
Bettini v Gye (1876)
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Ltd (1939)
7
Custom can imply terms into contract
Birch v Paramount Estates (1956)
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1936)
Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876)
Hutton v Warren (1836)
8
Statement not a term if innocent mistake and claimant should have noticed the mistake
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1936)
Oscar Chess v Williams (1957)
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Ltd (1939)
Hutton v Warren (1836)
9
Leading case for implied terms
Marks and Spencer v BNP Paribas (2015)
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (1965)
L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)
Birch v Paramount Estates (1956)
10
Statement becomes term if party is relying on skill of the other making the representation
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Ltd (1939)
Bannerman v White (1861)
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (1965)
Oscar Chess v Williams (1957)
11
An innominate term will be resolved on the level of injury following a breach
L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)
Grand China Logistics v Spar Shipping (2016)
L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)
Birch v Paramount Estates (1956)
12
The effectiveness of a business contract must be adhered to, terms can be implied to facilitate this
L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)
The Moorcock (1889)
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (1965)
Birch v Paramount Estates (1956)
13
If agreement signed, statements in agreement are terms
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1936)
Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith (1965)
L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)
Hutton v Warren (1836)
14
'Officious bystander test’ is which case
Bannerman v White (1861)
L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)
Bannerman v White (1861)
Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Ltd (1939)
15
There is an implied term as to quality and fitness for purpose
Oscar Chess v Williams (1957)
L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)
Liverpool City Council v Irwin (1977)
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1936)
16
Cannot make unreasonable term a condition even if labelled so
Birch v Paramount Estates (1956)
Schuler v Wickman Tools (1974)
Bannerman v White (1861)
Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876)
17
A statement is a term if it was so crucial to forming the contract that it became one
Birch v Paramount Estates (1956)
Bannerman v White (1861)
L’Estrange v Graucob (1934)
Hutton v Warren (1836)
18
Attendance is a condition of employment
Societe Generale v Geys (2012)
Grand China Logistics v Spar Shipping (2016)
Oscar Chess v Williams (1957)
Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876)
19
Can choose to make a non-crucial term a condition if do so expressly in contract
Bettini v Gye (1876)
Lombard v Butterworth (1987)
Societe Generale v Geys (2012)
Poussard v Spiers and Pond (1876)

The key cases on contract terms, conditions and representations Flashcards | StudBud