stud
bud
Sign up
Log in
Home
Library
Explore
SAT
More
Scots Law of Obligations- Cases Quiz Flashcards | StudBud
Explore
/
Scots Law of Obligations- Cases Quiz
Scots Law of Obligations- Cases Quiz
25 terms
·
StudBud Administration
·
17 plays
Imported from external platform
Flashcards
25 cards
F
Practice quiz
P
Host live
L
Questions
25
Answers
1
If a penalty clause is massively out of proportion to what would hypothetically be awarded as damages = unenforceable
Makdessi and Parking Eye
Finnie v Glasgow & South Western Railway
Smith v Bank of Scotland
Tsakiroglou v Noblee & Thurl
2
Dunlop v Higgins : Postal Acceptance Rule- Acceptance is deemed effective the moment the letter
reaches the recipient
True
False
3
NG: Which cases confirmed the
dominus negoti
must be incapacitated from interfering themselves?
Teacher v Calder
Fernie v Robertson
Kolbin & Sons v Kinnear & Co
Malik v Ali
4
A party seeking a remedy has to demonstrate they are not in breach of obligations (clean hands)
Macari v Celtic FC
Tennent v Tennent's Trustees
Cantiere San Rocco v Clyde Shipbuilding
Hadley v Baxendale
5
Restitutio in integrum must be possible for a contract to be voidable
Boyd & Forest v Glasgow South Western Railway Co
Earl of Orkney v Vinfra
Smith v Duke of Gordon
6
Privity of contract: A contract is
generally
exclusive to the parties who make it (Osborne v BBC), T or F?
False
True
7
M'Whirter v Longmuir: condition to be implied if it the nature is necessary to give the contract business efficacy
True
False
8
Cases you can reference for supervening illegality
Taylor v Caldwell
Robert Purvis Plant Hire Ltd v Farquhar Brewster
James Fraser v Denny Mott and Dickson
Cantiere San Rocco v Clyde Shipbuilding
9
Custom: a term so well known...that it was nothing but a waste of time and writing to introduce it to the contract
Ivey v Genting Casinos
Macari v Celtic FC
Morton & Co v Muir
Strathlorne Steamship v Baird & Sons
10
Cases you can reference for unjustified enrichment
Dollar Land v CIN Properties
Taylor v Provan
Cantiere San Rocco v Clyde Shipbuilding
Shilliday v Smith
11
Was McCutcheon bound by a clause bcos of a previous course of dealing even when he didn't have knowledge of the term?
True
False
12
Flynn v Scott- Misrepresentation: a mere expression of opinion is
sufficient
False
True
13
Earl of Orkney v Vinfra: Force and Fear:
Void
(T) or
Voidable
(F)?
True
False
14
Intention- Social arrangements- Presumption parties do not intend to enter into legally binding obligations
Erskine v Glendenning
Merritt v Merritt
Balfour v Balfour
Crawford v Bruce
15
Cases you can reference for supervening impossibility (or "utterly impracticable")
Wood v Moncur
Tay Salmon Fisheries v Speedie
Taylor v Caldwell
Mackeson v Boyd
16
Facility & Circumvention: needs weakening, taking advantage and loss
Flynn v Scott
Anderson v Beacon Fellowship
Steuarts Trustees v Hart
McCutcheon v MacBrayne
17
Which case confirmed the law was "
substantially the same
" in terms of frustration in England and Scotland?
Wood v Moncur
Page One Records v Britton
Shilliday v Smith
Robert Purvis Plant Hire v Farquhar Brewster
18
Signing
won't
always incorporate terms if they are so onerous that they should've been brought to the party's attention
Montgomery Litho v Maxwell
Ivey v Genting Casinos UK
Bannerman v White
Wade v Waldon
19
Capacity- “a lesser degree of drunkenness, which only darkens reason, has not the effect of annulling the contract.”
Merritt v Merritt
Jones v Vernon Pools
Mathieson Gee v Quigley
Taylor v Provan
20
An offer, once made, can be revoked at any time before the offerees acceptance is communicated to the offeror
McMillan v Caldwell
John Loudon v Elder’s Curator Bonis
Balfour v Balfour
Rutterford v Allied Breweries
21
Silence/inaction will not usually be deemed to be acceptance (of an offer)
Higgins v Wilson
Taylor v Provan
Muirhead & Turnbull v Dickson
Thomson v James
22
Consensus: If there is no consensus in idem, there is no contract.
Mathieson Gee v Quigley
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co
Higgins v Wilson
Glasgow Steam Shipping v Watson
23
DEFINITION OF PROMISE - a legal bond, unilateral undertaking that does not need acceptance
Wolf & Wolf v Forfar Potato Co
Malik v Ali
Sabre Leasing v Copeland
Royal Bank of Scotland v Carlyle
24
JR (Damages): Which case judged a pursuer can
generally
only claim monetary damages, not damages for "hurt feelings"?
Donoghue v Stevenson
Transfield Shipping v Mercator Shipping
Clyde Shipbuilding v Royal Bank of Scotland
Addis v Gramophone
25
Judicial Remedies (Sp. I.) : Which cases discussed a 'keep open' clause?
Retail Parks Investments v Royal Bank of Scotland
Diesen v Samson
Cavendish v Talal El Makdessi
Highland and Universal Properties v Safeway Properties