stud
bud
Sign up
Log in
Home
Library
Explore
SAT
More
Supreme Court Case Review Flashcards | StudBud
Explore
/
Supreme Court Case Review
Supreme Court Case Review
28 terms
·
StudBud Administration
·
20 plays
AP government court cases
Flashcards
28 cards
F
Practice quiz
P
Host live
L
Questions
28
Answers
1
Executive privilege does not extend to criminal case
United States V. Nixon
Griswald V. Connecticut
People's United V. United States
Buckley V. Valeo
2
Establishes "lemon test" on when government money can go to religious schools
Lemon V. Kurtzman
MIller V. California
Near V. Minnesota
Schenk V. United States
3
The death penalty does not violate the constitution
Miranda V. Arizona
Gregg V. Georgia
4
Empowers the federal government to regulate interstate commere
Lemon V. Kurtzman
Gibbons V. Ogden
5
Requires no "prior restraint" based on freedom of the press
NY Times V. United States
Near V. Minnesota
Texas V. Johnson
Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeir
6
Race can be considered in college admissions but no quotas
Regents of University of California V. Bakke
Gratz V. Bollinger
United States V. Nixon
Buckley V. Valeo
7
Expands federal "implied powers", expands federal powers over states
Gideon V. Wainwright
Gratz V. Bollinger
People's United V. United States
McCulouch V. Maryland
8
Slaves were not citizens
Plessy V. Ferguson
Roth V. United States
United States V. Nixon
Dred Scot V. Sanford
9
Extends prohibition of school led prayer to extra curricular activites
Santa Fe ISD V. Doe
Marbury V. Madison
NY Times V. United States
Engle V. Vitale
10
Privacy, body anatomy(abortion)
Griswald V. Connecticut
Buckley V. Valeo
Gibbons V. Ogden
Roe V. Wade
11
Extends Free Speech to the States
Marbury V. Madison
Gitlow V. New York
Roth V. United States
Gibbons V. Ogden
12
Implied right to privacy; including contraceptive use
McCulouch V Maryland
Roe V. Wade
United States V. Nixon
Griswald V. Connecticut
13
Corporations the same right protection as an individual in regards to campaign contributions
People's United V. United States
Lemon V. Kurtzman
14
Limits campaign contributions, but protects them as a form of free speech
Buckley V. Valeo
Regents of University of California V. Bakke
15
No school led prayer in public schools
Lemon V. Kurtzman
Gratz V. Bollinger
New York V. TLO
Engel V. Vitale
16
All people must be informed of their rights when being arrested
Mapp V. Ohio
Miranda V. Arizona
Gideon V. Wainwright
17
Limits free speech: "clear and present danger test"
Schenk V. United States
McCulouch V. Maryland
Gitlow V. New York
Griswald V. Connecticut
18
Separate but equal is ok, allowed segragation
People's United V. United States
Plessy V. Ferguson
Dred Scot V. Sanford
Santa Fe ISD V. Doe
19
Ends Dejure (seperate but equal) Segregation
Plessy V. Ferguson
Brown V. Board of Education
Gitlow V. New York
Dred Scot V. Sanford
20
Search and seizure in school without a warrant is ok
People's United V. United States
Buckley V. Valeo
New York V. TLO
21
Defines unreasonable search and seizure and the use of warrants in evidence collection
Terry V. Ohio
Griswald V. Connecticut
Nixon V. United States
Mapp V. Ohio
22
Search and seizure is ok with probable cause
Gibbons V. Ogden
Gideon V. Wainwright
Terry V. Ohio
Mapp V. Ohio
23
School officials can censor school publications for content
NY Times V. United States
Near V. Minnesota
Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeir
Miller V. California
24
Symbolic protest is protected by the 1st amendment
Terry V. Ohio
McDonald V. Chicago
Miranda V. Arizona
Texas V. Johnson
25
Obscenity is not protected by free speech: Common sense standard
Engle V. Vitale
People's United V. United States
United States V. Nixon
Miller V. California
26
Extends the right to an attorney to state criminal cases
Gregg V. Georgia
Miranda V. Arizona
Gideon V. Wainwright
New York V. TLO
27
Established judicial review
Buckley V. Valeo
Marbury V. Madison
Regents of University of California V. Bakke
Terry V. Ohio
28
Obscenity is not protected by free speech, common sense obscenity test
Roe V. Wade
Giddeon V. Wainright
Gregg V. Georgia
Roth V. United States