Biblical Worldview Unit 1 Test Review

A person must look at the evidence without any presuppositions so that his bias won't interfere with a fair analysis

Christians ought to distinguish between reverence and irreverence, purity and impurity

What's. one way to illustrate how a worldview works?

Instead of assuming an area of neutrality in the lower-story, Christians must recognize unbiblical influences everywhere

Which characters did the textbook use to show importance of distinguishing priorities based on contextual circumstances?

When religious values are excluded from the public square, conflicts can be resolved through the neutrality of reason

You can prove the Bible to an unbeliever when you can show him evidence that he can't refute

Facts can be understood to be facts only through the lens of a worldview interpretation

A heart system is made up of:

Religion and politics shouldn't mix

Some people don't have a worldview because they haven't made a formal study of their own beliefs

In the public square, it is impossible to discern what justice is without:

Christians should seek to participate in every realm, but what should never be sacrificed in order to participate?

When a person examines evidence, his conclusions are always formed according his head system and his heart system

Knowledge is:

Every intellectual reason for rejecting the faith has a heart reason behind it

What illustration is often used to portray separation between sacred and secular?

Evidence should be used to refute the unfounded claims of unbelievers

What two things always get mixed together when someone offers his conclusions about evidence?

Knowledge is a matter of:

An atheist who's an expert in ancient languages challenges the reliability of the biblical text, how should you respond?

What is a basic belief?

Faith is always anti-intellectual

What must count as the ultimate proof in the worldview apologetics approach?

A head system is made up of:

What ought to be the ultimate authority source for any truth claim?

It is impossible to defend the faith when you lack thorough knowledge of the scientific evidence

As long as a person has a set of beliefs and values, a metanarrative is unnecessary for his worldview

Who proposed that human reason ought to be the neutral standard by which to measure the reliability of all knowledge?

What are you seeking to find out when you trace someone's chain of thought back to the first link?

Secularists separate the sacred from the secular inconsistently