They DID NOT ask this question after the food slide show:

how often per week they eat the food in the photo

The 'believers' all had

an increase in FHI, RQ, FCQ, and MBQ for asparagus

The independent variable for both studies was

the false memory of loving asparagus

The dependent variable in experiment 2 was

results of questionnaires + slide show of food

Why is there low ecological validity in this study?

Food preference usually isn’t decided through questionnaires

Experiment 2: the slide show had _________________

20 pictures of foods for 30 seconds each

Another weakness of this study is

Only younger people were used, so results cannot be generalised

Experiment 2 Participants with the false memory

rated the asparagus photos 'more appetising' than control

Participants were all

volunteer undergraduate students

Experiment 2 : Aim___________

If false memory of asparagus changes participant's visual preference

From the results of experiment 1 it can be concluded that

false memories can be successful & can change food behaviors

A weakness of this study is

No research to test for false memory endurance

studbud

Laney

32 termsStudBud Administration19 plays

#AICE #Psychology #Falsememories

Flashcards32 cardsFPractice quizPHost liveL

Questions 32

Answers

1
They DID NOT ask this question after the food slide show:
how appetizing they found the food
the artistic quality of the photo of food
how often per week they eat the food in the photo
how disgusting they found the food
2
What does MBQ stand for?
memory belief questionnaire
memory being questionnaire
money budget questionnaire
mind body questionnaire
3
57% of the participants in the 'love' condition said they had a memory or belief of loving asparagus as a child
False
True
4
The 'believers' all had
A belief that they would order asparagus in the future
a decrease on the 'I would never buy asparagus' of the FPQ
an increase in FHI, RQ, FCQ, and MBQ for asparagus
an immediate desire to eat asparagus
5
This experiment was a/an
Match Participants Design
Independent Groups Design
Natural Experiment
Repeated Measures Design
6
How many participants were there originally in Study 1?
98
72
128
65
7
RQ stands for:
Restaurant Questionnaire
Ratings Questionnaire
Recent Questionnaire
Recall Questionnaire
8
This study controlled for demand characteristics well
False
True
9
The independent variable for both studies was
the questionnaires
whether they ended up loving asparagus
the false memory of loving asparagus
the smell of asparagus released in the room
10
There was an even balance of males & females in this study
True
False
11
The dependent variable in experiment 2 was
results of taste testing of asparagus
results of questionnaires
results of questionnaires + slide show of food
results of qualitative data from interview questions
12
Both experiments were what kind of study?
Quasi Study
Natural Study
Lab Study
Field Study
13
What does FCQ stand for?
food cost questionnaire
food customer questionnaire
food content questionnaire
food culture questionnaire
14
What year was this study done?
2008
1986
2002
1998
15
Why is there low ecological validity in this study?
Participants can't remember food preferences from 10 yrs old
Food preference usually isn’t decided through questionnaires
No children like asparagus
Experiment was done in a university cafeteria
16
A strength of this study is
deception was later resolved with debriefing
all the above
highly standardized procedure
large sample size yielded high levels of data
17
Experiment 2: the slide show had _________________
30 pictures of foods for 20 seconds each
20 pictures of foods for 30 seconds each
10 pictures of foods for 1 minute each
45 pictures of foods for 45 seconds each
18
Experiment 1 participants were from
The University of Wyoming
The Univeristy of Colorado
The University of Washington
The University of California
19
Another weakness of this study is
Individual food preferences were not taken into account
The study was too long
The data was confusing
Only younger people were used, so results cannot be generalised
20
What % of the 'love' condition became believers?
48%
22%
67%
57%
21
Memory is said to be:
All of the above
A reliable record of events
An active reconstruction
A static process
22
Some participant's results were excluded because
they originally noted they loved eating healthy
they originally strongly disliked asparagus
they originally had an allergy to asparagus
the originally loved asparagus
23
Experiment 2 Participants with the false memory
rated all healthy food as 'more appetising'
rated all green vegetables as 'more appetising'
rated the asparagus photos 'more appetising' than control
all of the above
24
Deception in this study was
psychologically harmful
highly unethical
necessary
physically harmful
25
False Memories can be implanted
Only before the age of 12
During encoding
During recall
Only after an event has taken place
26
Participants were all
randomly selected high school students
volunteer graduate male students
randomly selected university students
volunteer undergraduate students
27
None of the believers said they’d never buy asparagus
True
False
28
Experiment 2 : Aim___________
If false memory of asparagus changes participant's weight
If false memory of asparagus changes participant's eating habits
If false memory of asparagus changes participant's visual preference
If false memory of asparagus changes participant's memories
29
From the results of experiment 1 it can be concluded that
males like asparagus more than females
females like asparagus more than males
false memories cannot be implanted in participants
false memories can be successful & can change food behaviors
30
A weakness of this study is
Not enough quantitative data
Not enough qualitative data
Only men were used
No research to test for false memory endurance
31
What does FHI stand for?
Favorite Hungry Investment
Food History Interest
Food Hormone Inventory
Food History Inventory
32
The ability to recall specific structured events with some detail
Notion
Memories
Recall
Beliefs

Laney Flashcards | StudBud