Emp. I Review: Doughnut Economics

Raworth suggests getting savvy with systems for all these reasons except for

Using access to safe food as well as GDP as a metric of national success opposes DE paradigms.

Samuelson's 1958 Circular Flow diagram describes economies as having 2 main parts:

This is not a manifestation of the bond between humans and the natural world's erosion:

Raworth's paradigm is not that economies should be designed to distribute

Raworth does not believe 21st century decision-makers should consider

What should economic policies prioritize? Kate Raworth says:

One way cognitive biases prevent us from behaving like "homo economicus" is not

Raworth embeds the economy as 1 part of a big picture, not including

Raworth sees endless growth paradigms as problematic as a plane that rises infinitely.

Raworth suggests we replace the ever-rising plane economic paradigm with one of a

A business application of what Janine Benyus calls biomimicry is not:

Costs related to pollution, crime, biodiversity loss & disease are subtracted from GDP (Gross Domestic Product).

What should economic policies prioritize? Free market economists DON'T say:

Biophilic design embodies the "create to regenerate" paradigm; 1 reason for it is not to:

Examples of things designed to distribute do not include:

Raworth questions the idea of "homo economicus" as an always-rational, self-centered, fully-informed man.

Raworth's paradigm is that economic policy should focus on promoting

Plastics companies can create to regenerate, but not by considering how to

Neither Adam "InvisibleHandoftheMarket" Smith, JS Mill, JM Keynes nor H Chan ever said

Raworth rejects how the term "negative externalities" minimizes their importance; this isn't 1:

Reinforcing feedback loops in systems are countered by

Raworth says since GDP measures economic activity in a nation, it reflects life quality too.

All are aspects of human nature in Schwartz's Value Circumflex except for

Rockström's research did NOT find an ecological ceiling or catastrophic degradation related to:

Which are not paradigm shifts Raworth proposes?

The more citizens and governments invest and spend, the more GDP (Gross Domestic Product) increases.

Raworth suggests focusing less on GDP (Gross Domestic Product) and more on

Neither Raworth's social foundation nor UN Sustainable Development Goals include:

To Raworth, approaching economics like an engineer, not a gardner, means having this paradigm: