Forester - Argumentation Unit Review

This could best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

refuting/disproving by offering a contrary contention or argument

The belief that an argument is valid because a majority of people accept it

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

fear tactics

a claim rising out of another/further supports main claim

an argumentative appeal to reason, by offering clear, rational ideas

Expressing a point of view on a subject and supporting it with evidence; to convince/persuade

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

where a speaker/writer concedes/acknowledges some validity/merit of the opponent's point

This would best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

To misrepresent or simplify an argument in order to make it easier to discredit/knock down

helps to link evidence to claim

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

A conclusion that assumes that if “B”occurred after “A”, then “A” must have caused “B”

an argumentative appeal meant to establish the speaker as credible/trustworthy

the overall thesis that the writer/speaker argues for

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

An intentional, exaggerated statement; not to be taken literally

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

when a conclusion is based on a series of premises; first premise and conclusion: weakly linked

the art of using language effectively to persuade, inform, or inspire an audience.

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

What element is missing from this reliability/credibility test?

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

This could best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

Which of the following is NOT considered an appeal to logos?

this would best be described as which type of logical fallacy

This would best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

Which of the following best creates an appeal to pathos?

judge others based on one positive trait - apply that positive impression to abilities

for example: facts, statistics, anecdotes, expert opinions, data

Which element is missing from this rhetorical triangle?

an argumentative appeal to emotions

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

This would best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

A cau/effect relationship substantiated by a credible source is an example of which appeal?

This is most clearly an example of which argumentative appeal?

two contrasting concepts back-to-back, usually involving parallel argument structure

When an argument only acknowledges one side and/or is not fair or balanced, the argument demonstrates...

This would best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

when someone uses two ideas or situations that are not similar-leads to faulty/weak conclusion

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

This could best be described as which type of logical fallacy:

Which of the following is NOT a way to establish ethos in an argument?

when someone asks a question with the intention of making a point/argument, and the answer is implied:

This is an example of which rhetorical device?

This is an example of which rhetorical device?