Chapter 8: THE COMPARATIVE EFFECT OF LANGUAGE USED IN RECALL PROTOCOL IN READING COMPREHENSION

Question 1

Results based on the recall data may misrepresent the actual level of comprehension?

Accepted Answer

True

Question 2

How many categories of recall Fransson provides?

Accepted Answer

3

Question 3

Alderson (2000) indicates that the study of reading can be divided into two: the process and the product.

Accepted Answer

True

Question 4

According to Kobayashi recall protocols can be classified as either oral or written in terms of the language mode

Accepted Answer

True

Question 5

The think-aloud tasks used in real-time comprehension processes studies can be categorized into three kinds

Accepted Answer

Sentence-by-sentence talking, selective talking and after-the-fact talking

Question 6

Protocol methods allow researchers to investigate:

Accepted Answer

The levels of reading processes

Question 7

A protocol is a method that can be used.

Accepted Answer

True

Question 8

Where the advantages of protocol methods generally come from?

Accepted Answer

Their unique role in revealing the cognitive processes of a reader.

Question 9

What are the 3 terms that commonly describe the learner's mental processes?

Accepted Answer

Introspection, Retrospection and Think-aloud protocols.

Question 10

What is the objective of the Thinking-aloud protocol?

Accepted Answer

Intended to obtain information on reading comprehension processes.

Questions 10