Fundamental Rights Case Analysis

What was the official compelling state interest in Loving v. Virginia

Obergefell v. Hodges was reviewed under strict scrutiny.

SCOTUS found in Skinner v. Oklahoma that the state had a compelling state interest.

Skinner v. Oklahoma found that a fundamental right was at issue.

What was the fundamental right under issue in Stanley V. Illinois?

States can require clear and convincing evidence to terminate life support for an incompetent individual

Meyer v. Nebraska found that there was a fundamental right at issue.

What was the compelling state interest in Washington v. Glucksberg?

Strict scrutiny was applied to Loving v. Virginia

Stanley v. Illinois found that a fundamental right was at issue.

According to Planned Parenthood v. Casey, what standard should abortion laws be evaluated under?

There is a fundamental right at issue in roe v. wade.

The Massachusetts General Law in Eisenstadt v. Baird was the least restrictive and narrowly tailored.

What was the compelling state interest in Griswold v. Connecticut?

What was the fundamental right in question in Meyer v. Nebraska

There was an infringement of fundamental rights in Washington v. Glucksberg

Loving v. Virginia found that there was an infringement of a fundamental right by the Gov't.

There is a fundamental right at issue in Washington v. Glucksberg

What did Griswold v. Connecticut establish?

What was the fundamental right in Eisenstadt v. Baird.