stud
bud
Sign up
Log in
Home
Library
Explore
SAT
More
Duplicate of Supreme Court Cases Flashcards | StudBud
Explore
/
Duplicate of Supreme Court Cases
Duplicate of Supreme Court Cases
30 terms
·
StudBud Administration
·
11 plays
AP government court cases
Flashcards
30 cards
F
Practice quiz
P
Host live
L
Questions
30
Answers
1
Requires no "prior restraint" based on freedom of the press
Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeir
NY Times V. United States
Texas V. Johnson
Near V. Minnesota
2
Corporations the same right protection as an individual in regards to campaign contributions
People's United V. United States
Lemon V. Kurtzman
3
Extends Free Speech to the States
Gibbons V. Ogden
Roth V. United States
Gitlow V. New York
Marbury V. Madison
4
Limits campaign contributions, but protects them as a form of free speech
Regents of University of California V. Bakke
Buckley V. Valeo
5
Separate but equal is ok, allowed segragation
Santa Fe ISD V. Doe
Dred Scot V. Sanford
People's United V. United States
Plessy V. Ferguson
6
Extends the right to an attorney to state criminal cases
Miranda V. Arizona
Gideon V. Wainwright
Gregg V. Georgia
New York V. TLO
7
Slaves were not citizens
Plessy V. Ferguson
Dred Scot V. Sanford
Roth V. United States
United States V. Nixon
8
Obscenity is not protected by free speech, common sense obscenity test
Roe V. Wade
Gregg V. Georgia
Roth V. United States
Giddeon V. Wainright
9
Established judicial review
Regents of University of California V. Bakke
Terry V. Ohio
Buckley V. Valeo
Marbury V. Madison
10
No school led prayer in public schools
Gratz V. Bollinger
New York V. TLO
Lemon V. Kurtzman
Engel V. Vitale
11
Empowers the federal government to regulate interstate commere
Lemon V. Kurtzman
Gibbons V. Ogden
12
Limits free speech: "clear and present danger test"
McCulouch V. Maryland
Gitlow V. New York
Griswald V. Connecticut
Schenk V. United States
13
Executive privilege does not extend to criminal case
United States V. Nixon
Griswald V. Connecticut
Buckley V. Valeo
People's United V. United States
14
Affirmative action can a factor in college admissions but it can't be the deciding factor
Miller V. California
Schenk V. United States
Roth V. United States
Gratz V. Bollinger
15
Race can be considered in college admissions but no quotas
United States V. Nixon
Buckley V. Valeo
Gratz V. Bollinger
Regents of University of California V. Bakke
16
Privacy, body anatomy(abortion)
Buckley V. Valeo
Gibbons V. Ogden
Griswald V. Connecticut
Roe V. Wade
17
Search and seizure is ok with probable cause
Terry V. Ohio
Gideon V. Wainwright
Mapp V. Ohio
Gibbons V. Ogden
18
Search and seizure in school without a warrant is ok
Buckley V. Valeo
People's United V. United States
New York V. TLO
19
Obscenity is not protected by free speech: Common sense standard
People's United V. United States
United States V. Nixon
Engle V. Vitale
Miller V. California
20
Defines unreasonable search and seizure and the use of warrants in evidence collection
Terry V. Ohio
Griswald V. Connecticut
Nixon V. United States
Mapp V. Ohio
21
The death penalty does not violate the constitution
Gregg V. Georgia
Miranda V. Arizona
22
Expands federal "implied powers", expands federal powers over states
Gratz V. Bollinger
People's United V. United States
McCulouch V. Maryland
Gideon V. Wainwright
23
Implied right to privacy; including contraceptive use
McCulouch V Maryland
United States V. Nixon
Roe V. Wade
Griswald V. Connecticut
24
Ends Dejure (seperate but equal) Segregation
Gitlow V. New York
Brown V. Board of Education
Dred Scot V. Sanford
Plessy V. Ferguson
25
School officials can censor school publications for content
NY Times V. United States
Hazelwood V. Kuhlmeir
Near V. Minnesota
Miller V. California
26
Establishes "lemon test" on when government money can go to religious schools
Lemon V. Kurtzman
MIller V. California
Schenk V. United States
Near V. Minnesota
27
Extends prohibition of school led prayer to extra curricular activites
Engle V. Vitale
Marbury V. Madison
NY Times V. United States
Santa Fe ISD V. Doe
28
Incorporated the 2nd amendment to the states
Gitlow V. New York
NY Times V. Unites States
Texas V. Johnson
McDonald V. Chicago
29
All people must be informed of their rights when being arrested
Miranda V. Arizona
Mapp V. Ohio
Gideon V. Wainwright
30
Limits prior restraint to situations involving national security and classified info
NY Times V. United States
Mapp V. Ohio
Near V. Minnesota
McDonald V. Chicago